US Justice Department Examines Baseless Claims that Venezuela Rigged 2020 Election for Trump
The US Department of Justice is conducting an investigation into unfounded claims that Venezuela intervened in the 2020 presidential election to aid Donald Trump, according to sources. The probe involves interviews with multiple individuals who have promoted these baseless theories and has been linked to prominent figures in Trump's inner circle.
Gary Berntsen, a former CIA operative, and Martin Rodil, a Venezuelan expatriate, have been at the center of this conspiracy theory. They claim that electronic voting systems used in the US were secretly controlled by Venezuela's government, which allegedly helped rig elections worldwide. However, these claims were thoroughly debunked years ago, with Delaware judge ruling them false in 2023.
The investigation appears to be part of Trump's broader efforts to rewrite history and justify military action against Venezuela. The unfounded claims also echo Trump's long-standing "rigged election" complaints. The fact that the Justice Department is exploring these baseless allegations highlights the blurred lines between legitimate investigations and politically motivated inquiries.
Two figures, Muldrow, a US attorney for the district of Puerto Rico, and Berntsen, have reportedly briefed each other on the claims. Sources indicate that they share extensive information about the conspiracy theories, including documents and witnesses. This cooperation suggests that some Trump allies are using their connections to push this discredited narrative.
The involvement of Muldrow, who remains a key figure in Trump's inner circle, raises questions about how these baseless claims have become part of official investigations. The US attorney for the Tampa taskforce also declined to comment on the matter.
Some experts argue that this probe highlights the dangers of politicizing law enforcement and investigating unfounded conspiracy theories. While it is essential to hold election officials accountable, any credible investigation should focus on concrete evidence rather than baseless claims.
The US Department of Justice is conducting an investigation into unfounded claims that Venezuela intervened in the 2020 presidential election to aid Donald Trump, according to sources. The probe involves interviews with multiple individuals who have promoted these baseless theories and has been linked to prominent figures in Trump's inner circle.
Gary Berntsen, a former CIA operative, and Martin Rodil, a Venezuelan expatriate, have been at the center of this conspiracy theory. They claim that electronic voting systems used in the US were secretly controlled by Venezuela's government, which allegedly helped rig elections worldwide. However, these claims were thoroughly debunked years ago, with Delaware judge ruling them false in 2023.
The investigation appears to be part of Trump's broader efforts to rewrite history and justify military action against Venezuela. The unfounded claims also echo Trump's long-standing "rigged election" complaints. The fact that the Justice Department is exploring these baseless allegations highlights the blurred lines between legitimate investigations and politically motivated inquiries.
Two figures, Muldrow, a US attorney for the district of Puerto Rico, and Berntsen, have reportedly briefed each other on the claims. Sources indicate that they share extensive information about the conspiracy theories, including documents and witnesses. This cooperation suggests that some Trump allies are using their connections to push this discredited narrative.
The involvement of Muldrow, who remains a key figure in Trump's inner circle, raises questions about how these baseless claims have become part of official investigations. The US attorney for the Tampa taskforce also declined to comment on the matter.
Some experts argue that this probe highlights the dangers of politicizing law enforcement and investigating unfounded conspiracy theories. While it is essential to hold election officials accountable, any credible investigation should focus on concrete evidence rather than baseless claims.