UK government delays decision on China's super-embassy until January

UK Delays Decision on China's Super-Embassy Amid Keir Starmer's Visit to Beijing

The UK government has once again delayed its decision on whether to approve China's proposed super-embassy in London, pushing the deadline to January 20th, around the time Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to visit Beijing for bilateral talks.

Despite initial concerns from security services that handling the embassy's security risks was feasible, ministers now expect to greenlight the plans. The government claims consolidating China's existing diplomatic sites into a single embassy would bring "security advantages." The Chinese government has agreed to combine its London premises at the Royal Mint Court site, spanning over 20,000 square meters near Tower Bridge.

The decision is the third time ministers have deferred it, citing completion of security considerations. Starmer argued that the government needed to strike a balance in its approach to China, rejecting "hot and cold" policies. He described China as a major force in global governance, technology, trade, and ambition.

However, opposition from local residents and campaigners persists, with concerns about Beijing's human rights record in Hong Kong and Xinjiang. Protests have taken place near the proposed site in recent months.

The Home Office and Foreign Office had provided no objections on security grounds after formal submissions, prompting a government spokesperson to say that consolidating diplomatic sites would address national security issues. The Chinese embassy has called on the UK to approve the planning application quickly "to avoid further undermining mutual trust and cooperation between the two sides."

The decision is expected to be made by the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government in due course. China bought the Royal Mint Court site for Β£255m in 2018 but had initially faced setbacks after Tower Hamlets council refused planning permission in 2022.
 
πŸ€” just when u think china is gonna get its way lol πŸ™„ they're pushing the deadline again πŸ“† and we all know why πŸ‘€ it's not like the uk government has a secret love for china or anything 😜 but seriously, 20k sqm near tower bridge? πŸ’₯ that's like building a super embassy in the heart of london πŸ™οΈ. security advantages? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ sounds like they're just trying to justify their decision πŸ™ˆ and what about those concerns over hong kong and xinjiang? 🚨 doesn't seem like the uk is taking that seriously enough πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ we should be worried, tbh 😬. anyway, it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out πŸ‘€
 
omg i was literally thinking about china's embassy in london last night... i know some ppl r worried bout the security risks & human rights issues, but keir starmer seems to be all like "let's just chill" & talk to china about all this πŸ€”πŸ’¬ anyway, i wonder if we'll get that super-embassy anytime soon? maybe it's true what they say - consolidating diplomatic sites would bring security advantages lol who knows πŸ€‘
 
I'm kinda surprised they're approving this super-embassy deal πŸ€”! I mean, we know China's a major player globally, but have we really thought through the implications? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ The security concerns were initially legit worries, and I think it's a bit suspicious that they've changed their minds now 😏. Protests from locals aren't helping, either - it feels like this is going to be a PR win for China more than a genuine attempt to strengthen UK-China ties πŸ“’. Can we afford to let our guard down just yet? 🚫
 
the uk's delay on approving china's super-embassy is pretty suspicious πŸ€”... like what's really going on? they keep saying it'll bring security advantages, but the opposition from locals just doesn't add up 🚫. and yeah, starmer's visit to beijing next month does seem a bit too convenient for this decision to come through... maybe there's more to it than just 'st striking a balance' in their approach to china? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm like super stoked that the UK is delaying this decision again 🀯 it's like they're trying to make sure that China doesn't get a free pass to build its fancy embassy without anyone scrutinizing what's going on inside πŸ€” I mean, who are we kidding? This whole thing reeks of China getting its way and the UK just caving in πŸ€‘ The fact that Starmer is visiting Beijing around the same time as this decision gets made is like, totally suspicious πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈ What's he really going to talk about with Xi Jinping? 😏 I'm definitely not buying it when they say consolidating diplomatic sites will bring "security advantages" 🚫 Sounds like a bunch of hooey to me πŸ™„
 
I'm so done with this, it's just too much! 🀯 First of all, a super-embassy is just a fancy way of saying "China's got too big of a shoe to fit in our city" πŸ—ΊοΈ And we're basically giving them the green light because our PM thinks they're some kind of major world player? Newsflash: China's not exactly known for its commitment to human rights, and now they've got a huge embassy just chillin' near Tower Bridge... meanwhile, our residents are still fighting for their voices to be heard πŸ—£οΈ What about the security concerns?! Are we really gonna risk it all for a "balance" of approaches? I don't think so! πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised that the UK gov is still on the fence about this super-embassy, considering they've already spent a pretty penny on the site πŸ€‘ and Starmer's all about finding balance with China 🌎. It seems like a win-win situation for both countries, especially since security is supposed to be a bigger advantage πŸš«πŸ’Ό... unless there's some hidden info we're not seeing 🀐. Local residents are still getting anxious about the whole thing though 😬 and I get why they'd want to keep an eye on China's human rights record πŸ‘€. Maybe it's time for Starmer to make a clear stance, one way or another? πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€”β€β™‚οΈπŸ˜πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³β€πŸ“ˆπŸ’° "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade πŸ‹. When the UK delays China's super-embassy decision, just add 'security advantages' 😎" πŸš€
 
omg I'm literally hyped!!! 🀩 like can you even imagine having a super embassy in London?! πŸŒ† it's def going to be so cool! and keir starmer's visit to Beijing is all about making good vibes with china, right? 😊 i mean, china is literally the future of tech and trade, we need to get on board! πŸ’»πŸ’Έ and yeah, i know some ppl are worried bout security and human rights but like, let's not be dramatic, we're gonna make it work πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. btw, Β£255m for 20k sq meters?! that's a steal!!! πŸ’ΈπŸ‘€ can't wait to see this embassy come to life πŸ’₯
 
Omg what's going on with this super-embassy 🀯! I'm a bit surprised they're delaying it again, like, come on UK can you make up your minds? πŸ˜‚ I get that security is a big deal but 20,000 square meters near Tower Bridge? That's just crazy! πŸ’₯ I do hope the opposition from local residents gets heard, though - we need to think about the people living nearby πŸ™. And omg China's human rights record is SO concerning 😟. Can't wait to see what happens next... πŸ’ͺ
 
ugh, this is gonna be a game changer... china's super embassy is comin to london and no one's really prepared 🀯 the uk's just gonna sweep it under the rug cuz starmer said so and local residents are gettin worried about their human rights record in xijang 🚨 meanwhile, keir starmer's sittin on his throne thinkin we're all good with china's authoritarian ways πŸ’€ 20k sq meters is a lotta space for an embassy... wonder what other secrets they got hidin at the royal mint court site πŸ€‘
 
πŸ˜• I don't think it's a good idea to have a super-embassy in London, you know? πŸ€” Like what if something bad happens and the UK needs help? It'd be easier to just have regular embassies. And I'm still not sure about the whole security thing... 🚨
 
I'm a bit surprised that the gov's still dragging their feet on this one πŸ€”. I mean, we're supposed to be all about diplomacy and cooperation with China, right? But it seems like there's still a lot of uncertainty around here πŸ‘€. They keep saying it'll bring security advantages, but what exactly does that even mean? And what about those concerns from local residents? You'd think they'd at least get some sort of answer from the gov on this one πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

And I'm not buying all this "striking a balance" stuff from Starmer either πŸ™„. I know he's trying to be smooth, but it feels like they're just trying to have their cake and eat it too. You can't just ignore the elephant in the room – China's human rights record isn't exactly something you want to gloss over πŸ˜’.

I'm not asking for much, just some clarity on this one πŸ‘Š. When are we gonna get a straight answer from the gov?
 
I'm wondering if we're chasing the wrong kind of security here... I mean, we're talking about creating a super-embassy that's gonna be like a high-security fortress in the middle of London. Is that really what we want? Are we just trying to prove a point or control something instead of finding ways to build bridges with China?

I've been thinking, what is this concept of security anyway? Is it about protecting our own interests or about creating a safe space for others to thrive too? And what's the real cost of all these delays and back-and-forth negotiations? Are we just delaying the inevitable, trying to avoid making any real choices at all?

And then there's this idea that consolidating diplomatic sites is gonna bring "security advantages"... but are those even tangible things or just a result of our own fears and anxieties?
 
I think this is kinda cool that they're pushing the deadline to January... around Keir Starmer's visit to Beijing 🀝🏼! Maybe it'll be a great opportunity for him to have some open and honest chats with Xi Jinping about human rights stuff? I mean, I know there's been some pushback from locals, but if China can just prove they're willing to work together on security things... why not?! 🀞 It's like they say, "opposites attract" – who knows what good might come out of it! 😊
 
[Image of a cartoon ambassador with a confused expression]

Mmmm... security advantages? πŸ€”

[ GIF of a giant key turning, with a " locked" and " unlocked" symbol on either side ]

Wait, what's the plan again? πŸ˜‚

[ Image of a person trying to decipher a Chinese map, with a "lost in translation" stamp ]
 
πŸ€” they're just gonna push it to January 20th because Starmer is visiting Beijing and they need to make a good impression... meanwhile, locals are still super opposed to this thing πŸš«πŸ‘Ž it's just so convenient for China to get its embassy set up without any real scrutiny. And what about all the human rights concerns? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ does being a "major force in global governance" really excuse them from accountability? ⏰
 
I'm so annoyed that the UK gov't is delaying the decision on China's super-embassy again 🀯! It's like they're trying to avoid making a decision altogether πŸ˜’. I mean, what's taking them so long? The deadline keeps getting pushed back and it's just causing more uncertainty for everyone involved. And to make matters worse, the security services are saying it's feasible? Feasible?! That's just not good enough πŸ€”.

I'm also really confused about why they're trying to consolidate China's diplomatic sites into one embassy. I mean, what's going on here? Is it some kind of power play or something? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ And don't even get me started on the local residents and campaigners who are fighting against this. They have a right to be heard, you know? It's not just about China's human rights record in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, it's also about what this super-embassy is going to do for London πŸ€”.

The UK gov't needs to make up its mind already! ⏰ The Chinese embassy wants the planning application approved quickly "to avoid further undermining mutual trust and cooperation between the two sides." Yeah, yeah, I get it. But we need more transparency and accountability here πŸ‘€. Can someone please just give us a straight answer about what's going on?! 😩
 
πŸ€” china's super-embassy πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ is definitely a big deal πŸ“ˆ, especially with starmer's visit to beijing πŸ—ΊοΈ coming up. i think it's cool πŸ‘ that the gov't wants to bring all their diplomatic sites under one roof 🏒, but u also got to worry about security risks πŸ’₯ & local residents not wanting it near tower bridge πŸŒ‰. personally, i'd love to see more transparency about china's human rights record in hong kong & xinjiang πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. can't wait to see how this all plays out πŸŽ―πŸ‘€
 
Back
Top