US Military's Deadly Airstrike: Survivors Left to Cling to Wreckage for an Hour Before Fatal Attack
A harrowing video of a US airstrike on a suspected drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean has raised concerns about the military's actions. The footage shows two men, shirtless and unarmed, clinging to the wreckage of their damaged vessel for over an hour before they were killed in a second deadly attack.
The incident occurred on September 2nd, when a US airburst munition exploded above the vessel, killing nine crew members. The survivors, who appeared disoriented and uninjured, then managed to float in the water for about an hour before being targeted by additional munitions. Despite their efforts to flip the boat over, they were unable to prevent their deaths.
The video of the attack has sparked widespread outrage, with lawmakers describing it as "one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service." Democratic congressman Jim Himes said that the two survivors were clearly distressed and had no means of locomotion, emphasizing the military's role in attacking people who are not engaged in hostilities.
The Pentagon has defended the strike as a legitimate operation against drug traffickers, but many legal experts have rejected this rationale. Rebecca Ingber, a professor at Cardozo School of Law, stated that killing someone who is incapacitated or shipwrecked would be manifestly unlawful.
Critics argue that the US military's actions constitute potential war crimes, even before the killing of survivors. Marcus Stanley, director of studies at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, noted that the American people should have transparency and information about what is being done in their name.
The incident has raised questions about the legal basis for the US campaign to kill suspected drug smugglers. The Trump administration has argued that the US is at war with drug traffickers, but most experts reject this rationale.
As the debate continues, many are left wondering how such a tragic event could have occurred and what measures can be taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.
A harrowing video of a US airstrike on a suspected drug smuggling boat in the Caribbean has raised concerns about the military's actions. The footage shows two men, shirtless and unarmed, clinging to the wreckage of their damaged vessel for over an hour before they were killed in a second deadly attack.
The incident occurred on September 2nd, when a US airburst munition exploded above the vessel, killing nine crew members. The survivors, who appeared disoriented and uninjured, then managed to float in the water for about an hour before being targeted by additional munitions. Despite their efforts to flip the boat over, they were unable to prevent their deaths.
The video of the attack has sparked widespread outrage, with lawmakers describing it as "one of the most troubling things I've seen in my time in public service." Democratic congressman Jim Himes said that the two survivors were clearly distressed and had no means of locomotion, emphasizing the military's role in attacking people who are not engaged in hostilities.
The Pentagon has defended the strike as a legitimate operation against drug traffickers, but many legal experts have rejected this rationale. Rebecca Ingber, a professor at Cardozo School of Law, stated that killing someone who is incapacitated or shipwrecked would be manifestly unlawful.
Critics argue that the US military's actions constitute potential war crimes, even before the killing of survivors. Marcus Stanley, director of studies at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, noted that the American people should have transparency and information about what is being done in their name.
The incident has raised questions about the legal basis for the US campaign to kill suspected drug smugglers. The Trump administration has argued that the US is at war with drug traffickers, but most experts reject this rationale.
As the debate continues, many are left wondering how such a tragic event could have occurred and what measures can be taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.