US watchdog led by Trump ally investigates BBC Panorama edit of January 6 speech

FCC Launches Investigation into BBC Panorama's January 6 Speech Edit Amid Trump Threats of $5bn Lawsuit

A US media regulator led by a key ally of Donald Trump is investigating whether an edited version of the BBC's Panorama program breached federal regulations in its portrayal of one of the former president's speeches. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has written to the BBC, asking if the show was ever broadcast on its digital platform in the US, despite being available only to UK viewers.

The controversy centered around a January 6, 2021 speech by Trump that was edited to suggest he had incited violence at the US Capitol. The BBC's decision to air this edited version sparked widespread outrage and calls for an investigation into potential breaches of US regulations. However, it appears that the show may not have been aired on iPlayer in the US, raising questions about whether the FCC has jurisdiction over the issue.

FCC chairman Brendan Carr, a vocal critic of liberal media bias, has expressed concerns that the BBC's actions were "misleading and deceptive." He is now seeking to determine if the broadcaster provided any edited content to other regulated networks in the US, including PBS and NPR. The investigation may be seen as an attempt by Trump allies to exert pressure on the BBC over what they perceive as a biased reporting agenda.

While the UK's BBC has apologized for the edit and taken steps to address concerns about its journalism, Trump has threatened to sue the corporation for up to $5 billion in damages. However, experts have questioned the strength of this claim, citing the lack of concrete evidence suggesting that the edited version was broadcast on US soil.

The investigation highlights tensions between media regulators and international broadcasters over issues of jurisdiction and editorial standards. As the case unfolds, it remains to be seen whether the FCC's probe will yield any significant findings or if Trump's claims will ultimately prove baseless.
 
omg what's next?! ๐Ÿคฏ i feel like we're in a scene from that movie "The Truman Show" where everything is just too scripted ๐Ÿ˜‚. can't these guys just let the BBC do their thing? they edited the clip to show the real Trump, not some watered-down version ๐Ÿ‘Ž. and now trump's trying to take on the FCC and the BBC with a lawsuit of epic proportions ๐Ÿ’ธ like $5 billion?! that's just wild ๐Ÿคฏ. i'm not saying the BBC didn't cross any lines, but come on, can't we have a bit of nuance here? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing just goes to show you how sensitive some people can be about being called out for their actions. I mean, if someone edits a speech to suggest that Trump incited violence at the Capitol, and the BBC airs it anyway, shouldn't we be more concerned with what's going on behind the scenes? Is the FCC really just trying to protect Trump's feelings or is there something more to this investigation?

It's also interesting how quickly some people are willing to cry foul when they're being called out for their own biases. I mean, if you're a liberal media bias critic like Trump's ally Brendan Carr, it seems pretty convenient that the FCC is now investigating the BBC over supposed "misleading and deceptive" reporting.

But here's the thing: we can't let politicians dictate what kind of journalism is allowed or not. The best way to address these concerns is through transparency and open discussion, not by launching baseless investigations. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
omg can u beleev this?? ๐Ÿคฏ the fcc is investigating bbc for editing trump's speech but like what exactly did they do wrong? ๐Ÿค” i mean, it sounds pretty clear to me that the edited version was misleading and biased, but does the FCC even have jurisdiction over british broadcasting in the us? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ this whole thing just feels like a big ol' mess. and honestly, if trump's trying to sue them for 5 billion dollars, that's some pretty heavy hitting drama ๐Ÿ˜ฑ can't wait to see how this all plays out!
 
๐Ÿค” So I'm reading this news about the BBC getting investigated by the FCC over an edited speech from Donald Trump... ๐Ÿ“บ and honestly, I just don't get why the FCC is so upset. Like, isn't it their job to regulate media bias or something? ๐Ÿ˜… They're basically accusing the BBC of being deceptive because they showed a different version of a speech that's widely available online. I mean, come on, if you want to air an edited clip, just say what you're doing - "edited for US audience" or whatever! Don't make a big deal about it and then go after them with a $5bn lawsuit? ๐Ÿ’ธ That just seems like a huge overreaction to me... ๐Ÿ™„
 
๐Ÿค” this whole thing is just a big mess, you know? I mean, the BBC did air that edited speech and they should've been more careful with how it was presented... but at the same time, i can see why trump would be upset - he's got some serious grudges against certain outlets ๐Ÿ™„. and now the FCC is getting involved, which just adds to the drama. like, what's the real goal here? is it about protecting free speech or is it just about exerting pressure on the BBC? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ i hope they can get to the bottom of this without making things worse...
 
BBC got roasted ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ“บ for editing Trump's speech - not cool but who cares about $5bn? ๐Ÿ’ธ It's just another way for Trump to flex his online muscles ๐Ÿ˜ค Anyway, gotta wonder what other skeletons the BBC has in its closet ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
I'm not sure if I think this is a big deal at all... like, shouldn't we just let the BBC do its thing and air whatever content they want? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ But on the other hand, what if that edited speech really did breach US regulations? Like, how can you trust a broadcast that's been altered to fit an agenda? ๐Ÿ“บ And is it really fair to say that the FCC has jurisdiction over the BBC's digital platform in the US? I mean, they're basically saying "hey, we know more about your show than you do"... doesn't that sound a bit fishy? ๐ŸŸ

And can we talk about how this investigation is just an excuse for Trump to bully the BBC and try to silence them? Like, if he's got a problem with their journalism, why not have a fair debate or criticism rather than trying to strong-arm them into submission? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™‚๏ธ But at the same time, I guess it's also true that the BBC did make a mistake by airing an edited speech... so maybe this investigation isn't just about Trump trying to bully the BBC, but also about holding them accountable for their actions? ๐Ÿค”
 
This whole thing is so cringeworthy ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Like, what even is the point of investigating a BBC show that might have aired on iPlayer in the US? It's not like they're forcing anyone to watch it or anything ๐Ÿ™„. And Trump's threat of a $5 billion lawsuit is just laughable ๐Ÿ˜‚. I mean, come on, you can't just sue someone for "misleading and deceptive" reporting if there's no actual evidence to back it up ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ.

And can we talk about how this whole thing says more about the FCC's own credibility than anything else? Like, if they're so concerned about media bias, maybe they should be focusing on their own agenda rather than trying to silence an international broadcaster ๐Ÿค”. Oh well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see what kind of "findings" come out of this investigation ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
Back
Top