Wall Street rallies around Jerome Powell as Trump's attacks on the Fed threaten its independence.
The US banking community has spoken out in support of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, following President Donald Trump's escalating efforts to undermine the central bank's autonomy. CEO Jamie Dimon from JPMorgan Chase was among those who publicly backed Powell, warning that interference with the outgoing Fed chair could "undermine the foundation" of the US economy.
Dimon's comments marked a shift in his earlier stance on policy disagreements, as he had previously sought to maintain a neutral tone while still disagreeing with Trump's views. However, the President has taken a harder line against Dimon, labeling him "wrong" and suggesting that he may prefer higher interest rates for personal gain.
Other banking leaders, including Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan and head of the Bank of New York Mellon Robin Vince, have also criticized Trump's attacks on the Fed. They argue that the central bank's independence is crucial to maintaining economic stability and preventing short-term political pressures from influencing policy decisions.
Former economic officials have joined the chorus of support for Powell, including former Fed chairs Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, and Alan Greenspan. More than a dozen past leaders issued a statement on January 12 warning that Trump's approach has "no place" in US monetary policy-making, citing its potential to lead to negative consequences for inflation and economic stability.
Internationally, central bankers have also rallied around Powell, praising his commitment to the public interest and integrity. The heads of the European Central Bank, Bank of England, and Bank of Canada, among others, signed a letter expressing their admiration for Powell's leadership.
The outpouring of support for Powell from Wall Street has highlighted the importance of Fed independence in maintaining economic stability. As Trump continues to pressure the central bank to cut interest rates, many are questioning whether his approach is driven by short-term political considerations rather than long-term economic benefits.
The US banking community has spoken out in support of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, following President Donald Trump's escalating efforts to undermine the central bank's autonomy. CEO Jamie Dimon from JPMorgan Chase was among those who publicly backed Powell, warning that interference with the outgoing Fed chair could "undermine the foundation" of the US economy.
Dimon's comments marked a shift in his earlier stance on policy disagreements, as he had previously sought to maintain a neutral tone while still disagreeing with Trump's views. However, the President has taken a harder line against Dimon, labeling him "wrong" and suggesting that he may prefer higher interest rates for personal gain.
Other banking leaders, including Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan and head of the Bank of New York Mellon Robin Vince, have also criticized Trump's attacks on the Fed. They argue that the central bank's independence is crucial to maintaining economic stability and preventing short-term political pressures from influencing policy decisions.
Former economic officials have joined the chorus of support for Powell, including former Fed chairs Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, and Alan Greenspan. More than a dozen past leaders issued a statement on January 12 warning that Trump's approach has "no place" in US monetary policy-making, citing its potential to lead to negative consequences for inflation and economic stability.
Internationally, central bankers have also rallied around Powell, praising his commitment to the public interest and integrity. The heads of the European Central Bank, Bank of England, and Bank of Canada, among others, signed a letter expressing their admiration for Powell's leadership.
The outpouring of support for Powell from Wall Street has highlighted the importance of Fed independence in maintaining economic stability. As Trump continues to pressure the central bank to cut interest rates, many are questioning whether his approach is driven by short-term political considerations rather than long-term economic benefits.