Valve's Steam Machine may be doomed by its own high component costs. The upcoming gaming PC box is facing a perfect storm of soaring RAM and storage prices, which could make it an unaffordable luxury for many consumers.
Analysts expect the price of the 512GB model to start at around $599, while the high-end 2TB version might cost upwards of $1,000. That would put it firmly out of reach of many gamers who are used to buying games and hardware from Sony or Microsoft for significantly less.
Valve is not an enormous player in the hardware space, which means it doesn't have the same kind of negotiating power as large console makers like Sony and Microsoft. This could make it harder for Valve to absorb the increasing cost of components and pass them on to consumers without taking a hit to profit margins.
However, some analysts believe that Valve's pricing strategy is not as straightforward as this. The company has already made significant investments in its supply chain and may be able to negotiate better prices with suppliers than smaller manufacturers. Additionally, selling the Steam Machine primarily through direct sales via the web and Steam itself eliminates the usual retailer markups that console makers have to take into account.
But even if Valve is able to get the best possible price for its components, some analysts believe that a high starting price of $700 or more could be "a death sentence" for the product. This would limit the audience for the Steam Machine and make it less competitive in the market.
In reality, the relative price difference between Valve and other console makers will still matter, even if the company is able to get a better price on its components. The analysts who spoke to Ars agree that Valve may have to price its Steam Machine above competitors like Sony and Microsoft, which could limit its appeal to consumers who are looking for a high-end gaming experience.
Ultimately, how Valve handles Steam Machine pricing will depend on whether the company wants to expand its audience beyond enthusiasts and into the territory currently held by PlayStation and Xbox. If it does, the memory cost shock may pose a challenge in terms of growth.
Analysts expect the price of the 512GB model to start at around $599, while the high-end 2TB version might cost upwards of $1,000. That would put it firmly out of reach of many gamers who are used to buying games and hardware from Sony or Microsoft for significantly less.
Valve is not an enormous player in the hardware space, which means it doesn't have the same kind of negotiating power as large console makers like Sony and Microsoft. This could make it harder for Valve to absorb the increasing cost of components and pass them on to consumers without taking a hit to profit margins.
However, some analysts believe that Valve's pricing strategy is not as straightforward as this. The company has already made significant investments in its supply chain and may be able to negotiate better prices with suppliers than smaller manufacturers. Additionally, selling the Steam Machine primarily through direct sales via the web and Steam itself eliminates the usual retailer markups that console makers have to take into account.
But even if Valve is able to get the best possible price for its components, some analysts believe that a high starting price of $700 or more could be "a death sentence" for the product. This would limit the audience for the Steam Machine and make it less competitive in the market.
In reality, the relative price difference between Valve and other console makers will still matter, even if the company is able to get a better price on its components. The analysts who spoke to Ars agree that Valve may have to price its Steam Machine above competitors like Sony and Microsoft, which could limit its appeal to consumers who are looking for a high-end gaming experience.
Ultimately, how Valve handles Steam Machine pricing will depend on whether the company wants to expand its audience beyond enthusiasts and into the territory currently held by PlayStation and Xbox. If it does, the memory cost shock may pose a challenge in terms of growth.