Darren Aronofsky's AI studio Primordial Soup has released a year-long series of short-form historical documentaries called "On This Day... 1776" - but despite its ambitious goal to revolutionize filmmaking with artificial intelligence, many are questioning the project's effectiveness.
Critics have panned the initial episodes for their poor quality, citing repetitive camera movements and unconvincing performances from AI-generated avatars of historical figures. The AV Club described the videos as "an ugly look at American history", while CNET accused them of being a "hellish broth of machine-driven AI slop and bad human choices".
However, those close to the production argue that the quality will improve over time as the team refines its AI tools and learns how to better utilize them. The project's creators acknowledge that the technology is still evolving and that they are eager to experiment with new possibilities.
The "On This Day... 1776" series is an attempt to push the boundaries of what is possible in filmmaking, leveraging AI to create photorealistic scenes and avatars of historical figures. But critics have raised concerns about the consistency and quality of these digital creations, highlighting their inability to replicate human emotions and nuanced performances.
The project's director, Darren Aronofsky, has stated that his goal is not to replace traditional filmmaking methods but to expand what is possible with AI tools. He sees this technology as a means to explore new creative avenues and push the boundaries of storytelling.
While some have welcomed this innovation, others are growing increasingly concerned about the impact on human artists and creatives. The rise of AI-generated content has led some to worry that talented individuals will be replaced by machines, sparking fears about the future of art and entertainment.
As the "On This Day... 1776" series continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether its creators can deliver a compelling narrative while harnessing the potential of AI technology.
Critics have panned the initial episodes for their poor quality, citing repetitive camera movements and unconvincing performances from AI-generated avatars of historical figures. The AV Club described the videos as "an ugly look at American history", while CNET accused them of being a "hellish broth of machine-driven AI slop and bad human choices".
However, those close to the production argue that the quality will improve over time as the team refines its AI tools and learns how to better utilize them. The project's creators acknowledge that the technology is still evolving and that they are eager to experiment with new possibilities.
The "On This Day... 1776" series is an attempt to push the boundaries of what is possible in filmmaking, leveraging AI to create photorealistic scenes and avatars of historical figures. But critics have raised concerns about the consistency and quality of these digital creations, highlighting their inability to replicate human emotions and nuanced performances.
The project's director, Darren Aronofsky, has stated that his goal is not to replace traditional filmmaking methods but to expand what is possible with AI tools. He sees this technology as a means to explore new creative avenues and push the boundaries of storytelling.
While some have welcomed this innovation, others are growing increasingly concerned about the impact on human artists and creatives. The rise of AI-generated content has led some to worry that talented individuals will be replaced by machines, sparking fears about the future of art and entertainment.
As the "On This Day... 1776" series continues to evolve, it remains to be seen whether its creators can deliver a compelling narrative while harnessing the potential of AI technology.
I mean, come on, if you're gonna use AI for historical documentaries, at least have the decency to make 'em look decent first 
. These initial episodes are straight out of a bad YouTube tutorial - repetitive camera movements and AI avatars that look like they were made in a bad video game 
. I'm all for innovation, but if you're gonna experiment with this tech, put some effort into it, ya know? 
. the first ep's are just kinda...meh. but if they can iron out some of these issues, it could be really cool to see how they use AI in a more nuanced way 
. aronofsky's intentions seem legit, and i love that he's pushing the boundaries of storytelling, even if it means taking some risks 
. the thing is, though, can we trust that this tech isn't gonna replace human artists entirely? 
how can u just diss a whole project like that? i mean yeah the first ep was a bit rough but come on dont count out 9 episodes in 
and havent they said it's gonna get better?? 
u gotta give ppl a chance to learn & adapt rn. its all about experimentin & pushin boundaries, not just churnin out some generic ai garbage 
avatars look all wrong and camera movements are so repetitive it's like they're just copy-pasting from other vids. don't even get me started on the quality 
can't wait to see how they improve tho
and who knows maybe the quality will improve as they refine their tech 
]
. Still, it's gotta be a concern for human artists - I hope they're not feeling too left behind by this AI revolution