The lavish production of "Melania," a film about the third wife and first lady of President Donald Trump, has yielded a disappointing box office performance. Despite Amazon's $75 million investment in the project – a whopping $40 million for rights acquisition plus an additional $35 million for marketing and release – there are no sold-out screenings, no viral clips, and no manufactured outrage to fuel publicity.
The film's failure is not due to critical backlash or liberal boycotts, but rather because the MAGA community, comprising of Trump supporters, simply doesn't care about this documentary. This is a stark contrast to how right-wing media operates, where "grievance theater" often draws massive attention. In this context, "cinematic viewing" is not enough to stir passion in the hearts of those who crave spectacle.
The problem lies with Melania herself – or rather, her absence as a cultural figure. Her image, devoid of depth or intrigue, presents no compelling narrative for audiences seeking substance. Unlike liberal villains or marginalized groups that evoke outrage, there's nothing here to rile up Trump supporters.
What does have the power to mobilize them, however, is the idea of shared resentment and the perception that President Trump is fighting against corrupt elites on behalf of ordinary people. But when his family – including Melania – profits from their connection to him, as has been the case in this film's production, this narrative falls apart.
The involvement of director Brett Ratner, who has faced multiple allegations of sexual harassment and assault, only adds to the skepticism surrounding the project. It's not surprising then that Trump supporters are wary of this documentary, recognizing it for what it is – a self-serving vanity project with little to offer in terms of meaningful storytelling.
In fact, this film serves as a microcosm of the rot at the intersection of wealth, power, and media. The Wall Street Journal reported that Melania herself pocketed over $28 million from her participation in the documentary, fueling accusations that this was an attempt by Amazon's Jeff Bezos to curry favor with Trumpworld.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post – another institution owned by Bezos – has been hemorrhaging talent, with numerous journalists and columnists fleeing due to perceived pressure on editorial board endorsements. The paper's credibility has taken a hit, reflecting Bezos' priorities over journalistic integrity. This collaboration between business interests and media outlets risks undermining democracy itself.
Ultimately, this film serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of trying to sway public opinion through manipulation and self-serving projects. When those in power attempt to buy influence or curry favor with powerful groups like Trump supporters, the result is often a hollow shell of an idea that fails to resonate.
The film's failure is not due to critical backlash or liberal boycotts, but rather because the MAGA community, comprising of Trump supporters, simply doesn't care about this documentary. This is a stark contrast to how right-wing media operates, where "grievance theater" often draws massive attention. In this context, "cinematic viewing" is not enough to stir passion in the hearts of those who crave spectacle.
The problem lies with Melania herself – or rather, her absence as a cultural figure. Her image, devoid of depth or intrigue, presents no compelling narrative for audiences seeking substance. Unlike liberal villains or marginalized groups that evoke outrage, there's nothing here to rile up Trump supporters.
What does have the power to mobilize them, however, is the idea of shared resentment and the perception that President Trump is fighting against corrupt elites on behalf of ordinary people. But when his family – including Melania – profits from their connection to him, as has been the case in this film's production, this narrative falls apart.
The involvement of director Brett Ratner, who has faced multiple allegations of sexual harassment and assault, only adds to the skepticism surrounding the project. It's not surprising then that Trump supporters are wary of this documentary, recognizing it for what it is – a self-serving vanity project with little to offer in terms of meaningful storytelling.
In fact, this film serves as a microcosm of the rot at the intersection of wealth, power, and media. The Wall Street Journal reported that Melania herself pocketed over $28 million from her participation in the documentary, fueling accusations that this was an attempt by Amazon's Jeff Bezos to curry favor with Trumpworld.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post – another institution owned by Bezos – has been hemorrhaging talent, with numerous journalists and columnists fleeing due to perceived pressure on editorial board endorsements. The paper's credibility has taken a hit, reflecting Bezos' priorities over journalistic integrity. This collaboration between business interests and media outlets risks undermining democracy itself.
Ultimately, this film serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of trying to sway public opinion through manipulation and self-serving projects. When those in power attempt to buy influence or curry favor with powerful groups like Trump supporters, the result is often a hollow shell of an idea that fails to resonate.