Woman who lost arm and leg in NYC subway strike awarded nearly $82M by jury

Federal Jury Hands Down $81.7 Million Verdict to Brazilian Woman Injured by NYC Subway Train

A federal jury has delivered a crushing blow to New York City's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), ordering it to pay nearly $82 million to a Brazilian woman who was severely injured when she fell onto subway tracks in 2016.

Luisa Janssen Harger Da Silva, then just 21 years old, sued the MTA, claiming that her accident was preventable and avoidable. The train struck her on the B and Q platform at Atlantic Avenue-Barclays Center station, severing her left arm and leg. She spent nearly a month in Bellevue Hospital undergoing multiple surgeries and skin grafts to repair her wounds.

The jury deliberated for only an hour before delivering its verdict, which marks one of the largest settlements ever awarded to an individual by the MTA. Da Silva's lawyer, Elliot Shields, described the outcome as "finally" bringing accountability for what happened to his client, who is now permanently disabled and unable to work due to her injuries.

The lawsuit alleged that the MTA was negligent in not installing platform barriers to prevent people from falling onto the tracks. The agency also failed to adequately study and address the number of fatalities caused by subway trains in New York City, with data suggesting that three to five people are struck by trains every week.

Despite being aware of the risks, the MTA had considered installing screen doors on platforms as far back as 2011, but ultimately decided against it. However, just last year, the agency began installing fixed barriers on sections of platforms at roughly 100 stations, a cheaper solution that still failed to prevent Da Silva's accident.

The verdict has sparked outrage among advocates for subway safety, who point out that the MTA had ample opportunity to install effective safety measures but chose not to do so. "Every rider should feel safe standing on the platform," said Brian Fritsch, associate director of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA. "Gov. Kathy Hochul has acted decisively on this issue, committing to install platform barriers at more than 100 subway stations by the end of the year."

The MTA has already announced plans to launch a track intrusion technology pilot and resume its platform screen door pilot, but advocates say that these measures are too little, too late. "They knew about this hazard, they knew there were feasible solutions and they did nothing," Shields said. "Our client and thousands of other people in New York over the past few decades have suffered catastrophic injuries or been killed, and it was all preventable."
 
πŸ˜’ 82 million for one person is crazy but you can't put a price on someone's life 🀯. I mean, it's not like the MTA didn't know about these risks before... they basically knew train-related deaths were happening every week and chose to do nothing 🚫. Like, installing some basic barriers wouldn't be that hard πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ. The fact that they're already planning on launching a pilot program now is just a slap in the face πŸ™„. I guess it's better late than never πŸ’Έ. Still, you can't help but think about all those other people who got hurt or killed by the subway and thought nothing would ever happen to them πŸ˜”.
 
πŸ˜” The MTA has been pretty reckless with safety measures... I mean, you'd think installing barriers would be a no-brainer, but they kinda waited around for like 4 years before deciding to implement a cheaper alternative πŸš‚πŸ’Έ. And now some girl's gotta pay the price... $82 million is a huge sum of money, hope she gets some decent care outta it πŸ’•. It just goes to show that safety can't be just a priority if you're making money off the side πŸ€‘.
 
🚨 I've got tea on this subway train case... The verdict is super concerning, IMHO πŸ€”. It's crazy that the MTA knew about platform barriers since 2011 but didn't install them until now πŸ•°οΈ. And we're only seeing fixed barriers at like 100 stations? That's still not enough for me 🚫. I've been following this case and it's clear that the agency was aware of the risks but chose to prioritize cost over people's lives πŸ’Έ. The $82 million verdict is a drop in the bucket, tbh πŸ’ΈπŸ’Έ.

Luisa Da Silva's story is heartbreaking πŸ€•. She's been through so much and it's not fair that she had to suffer like this. I'm glad her lawyer Elliot Shields was able to get some justice for his client πŸ™Œ, but at what cost? The MTA needs to take responsibility for their negligence and do more to ensure public safety πŸ’₯.

I'm also wondering why Gov Kathy Hochul is being praised for taking action on subway safety πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. It's about time, I guess 😐. But did they really learn from their mistakes or are they just trying to deflect attention? 🚨
 
🚫 $82 million is just not enough for a life like Luisa's πŸ˜” She was 21 and now she can't work due to those train tracks πŸ€• And I'm still not sure why the MTA didn't install screens sooner πŸ“† They've known about this hazard since 2011 and did nothing about it πŸ’Έ I mean what's wrong with taking extra precautions for people's safety? πŸ€” It's not like they're asking for much. Just some basic barriers to prevent train accidents, especially on busy platforms πŸš‚ And now it's gonna cost $82 million, but is that justice for Luisa? πŸ’Έ
 
😀 I'm literally fuming right now... $81.7 million is just insane! πŸ’Έ The MTA has been so reckless with people's lives for years and now they're finally getting held accountable 😑. It's not like this woman asked to be injured, she was just minding her own business on the platform 🀯. And what really gets me is that they had options all along, but they chose not to take them πŸ’”. Installing screen doors would've been a no-brainer, and now they're trying to say that track intrusion tech is the answer? πŸ˜‚ Please, it's too little, too late πŸ•°οΈ. This verdict is long overdue, but I'm still so angry about how this all went down 😀. It's just not fair to people like Luisa who've been left with permanent disabilities because of the MTA's negligence πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ.
 
πŸš‚πŸ’Έ This verdict is a major wake-up call for the MTA! They've been dragging their feet on installing safety measures for years, putting riders' lives at risk. 🀯 I mean, what's more Republican than cutting costs and going with the cheaper option? πŸ’Έ It's all about prioritizing profits over people, which is exactly the kind of short-sightedness we see in many government agencies. πŸ˜’ But hey, at least they're finally taking some action... 100 stations is a good start, I guess πŸ™„. We need to hold our elected officials accountable for this kind of neglect and demand more comprehensive safety measures. πŸ’ͺ The fact that Governor Hochul is stepping up on this issue shows she's willing to listen to her constituents, but we need more action, not just words! πŸ’¬
 
OMG I'm low-key shocked by this massive settlement 🀯! $82 million is, like, crazy talk for a single incident. The MTA knew about the risks of people falling onto the tracks but still didn't do anything about it πŸ’Έ. It's wild that they were totes aware of the issue since 2011 and decided against installing screen doors πŸ™„. Now, Gov Kathy Hochul is all like "oh no, I'm gonna install barriers" 🀣, but is it too little, too late? πŸ•°οΈ. I mean, 100 stations by the end of the year sounds cool and all, but what about the ones they haven't addressed yet? πŸ€”. Anyways, Luisa's victory is definitely a win for safety advocates πŸ’ͺ. Hopefully, this verdict makes people sit up and take notice πŸ—£οΈ.
 
Back
Top