A Growing Body of Evidence Suggests Pet Loss Can Trigger Chronic Grief, Redefining What It Means to Be Bereaved.
Researchers have long known that humans form strong bonds with their pets. However, it's now becoming increasingly clear that these relationships can be just as emotionally devastating as those with family members. A recent study published in the PLOS One journal reveals that people experiencing the loss of a pet may be suffering from prolonged grief disorder (PGD), a mental health condition characterized by intense longing and despair.
According to the survey, conducted among 975 adults in the UK, nearly 8% of those who had lost pets met the diagnostic criteria for PGD. This rate is strikingly similar to that found after the death of close friends or family members, including grandparents (8.3%), siblings (8.9%), and partners (9.1%). The study suggests that up to one in 12 cases of PGD in the UK may be attributed to pet loss.
Researchers have long cautioned against shame or stigma associated with expressing grief over a deceased pet. However, the new findings suggest that these feelings are not only unwarranted but also dismissive of the profound emotional impact pets can have on their owners.
According to Dr. Philip Hyland, lead researcher and professor of psychology at Maynooth University in Ireland, "The symptoms of grief for a pet match identically with those for a human. There is no difference in how people experience these losses." He argues that current diagnostic guidelines are outdated and fail to recognize the legitimacy of pet-related bereavement.
Hyland's team estimates that nearly one-fifth of people who have experienced both pet and human loss reported that their grief over the pet was more intense, a finding that challenges previous assumptions about the relative significance of these losses. The research highlights the need for expanded diagnostic guidelines to include pets as legitimate risk factors for PGD.
The implications of this study are far-reaching. By recognizing the complexity and depth of human-animal relationships, we may be forced to reevaluate our understanding of grief and bereavement. As Hyland so eloquently puts it, "This would be an extraordinarily difficult position to defend... It's not just scientifically misguided but also callous."
Researchers have long known that humans form strong bonds with their pets. However, it's now becoming increasingly clear that these relationships can be just as emotionally devastating as those with family members. A recent study published in the PLOS One journal reveals that people experiencing the loss of a pet may be suffering from prolonged grief disorder (PGD), a mental health condition characterized by intense longing and despair.
According to the survey, conducted among 975 adults in the UK, nearly 8% of those who had lost pets met the diagnostic criteria for PGD. This rate is strikingly similar to that found after the death of close friends or family members, including grandparents (8.3%), siblings (8.9%), and partners (9.1%). The study suggests that up to one in 12 cases of PGD in the UK may be attributed to pet loss.
Researchers have long cautioned against shame or stigma associated with expressing grief over a deceased pet. However, the new findings suggest that these feelings are not only unwarranted but also dismissive of the profound emotional impact pets can have on their owners.
According to Dr. Philip Hyland, lead researcher and professor of psychology at Maynooth University in Ireland, "The symptoms of grief for a pet match identically with those for a human. There is no difference in how people experience these losses." He argues that current diagnostic guidelines are outdated and fail to recognize the legitimacy of pet-related bereavement.
Hyland's team estimates that nearly one-fifth of people who have experienced both pet and human loss reported that their grief over the pet was more intense, a finding that challenges previous assumptions about the relative significance of these losses. The research highlights the need for expanded diagnostic guidelines to include pets as legitimate risk factors for PGD.
The implications of this study are far-reaching. By recognizing the complexity and depth of human-animal relationships, we may be forced to reevaluate our understanding of grief and bereavement. As Hyland so eloquently puts it, "This would be an extraordinarily difficult position to defend... It's not just scientifically misguided but also callous."