The $500 billion global beauty industry has set ambitious environmental goals, but its efforts to become more sustainable are proving to be a patchwork at best.
According to a recent study by strategy and consulting firm Simon Kucher, 60% of consumers worldwide consider sustainability an important purchase criterion, with 35% willing to pay more for eco-friendly products. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted many beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as phasing out single-use plastics and using recyclable, reusable, or refillable packaging.
However, consumers continue to struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency. The British Beauty Council notes that "greenwashing" - where companies make unsubstantiated sustainability claims - is common in the beauty industry.
The use of marketing terms like "clean beauty" has become increasingly problematic, with some critics arguing that these buzzwords are used to sell more products rather than drive meaningful change. Industry leaders and experts stress the need for better transparency and certification standards, particularly when it comes to ingredient sourcing and packaging materials.
One major challenge facing the industry is plastic packaging, which accounts for 67% of its packaging volume. The cosmetics business is one of the biggest users of plastic packaging globally, with beauty giants like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder Companies using massive amounts of plastic in their packaging material each year. However, recycling rates are low, and demand for post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic is high due to supply chain limitations.
Beauty retailers also play a pivotal role in promoting sustainability, but many vary when it comes to setting standards for the brands they sell. While some companies have launched initiatives like Sephora's "Clean + Planet Positive" program or Target's "Target Zero" icon, others lack transparency and accountability.
The missing piece of the puzzle is regulation and standardization. Certifications like B Corp are beneficial, but their voluntary nature limits their impact. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for sustainability claims would help drive meaningful change in the industry. Industry leaders emphasize that market leadership is key to driving climate-conscious change.
In the absence of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices, this "leadership" - undertaken by brands and customers alike in the beauty marketplace - will likely be the most impactful vector for addressing the industry's climate shortcomings. It will take continued collective advocacy and initiative to drive meaningful climate-conscious change in the $500 billion global beauty industry.
According to a recent study by strategy and consulting firm Simon Kucher, 60% of consumers worldwide consider sustainability an important purchase criterion, with 35% willing to pay more for eco-friendly products. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted many beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as phasing out single-use plastics and using recyclable, reusable, or refillable packaging.
However, consumers continue to struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency. The British Beauty Council notes that "greenwashing" - where companies make unsubstantiated sustainability claims - is common in the beauty industry.
The use of marketing terms like "clean beauty" has become increasingly problematic, with some critics arguing that these buzzwords are used to sell more products rather than drive meaningful change. Industry leaders and experts stress the need for better transparency and certification standards, particularly when it comes to ingredient sourcing and packaging materials.
One major challenge facing the industry is plastic packaging, which accounts for 67% of its packaging volume. The cosmetics business is one of the biggest users of plastic packaging globally, with beauty giants like L'Oréal and Estee Lauder Companies using massive amounts of plastic in their packaging material each year. However, recycling rates are low, and demand for post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic is high due to supply chain limitations.
Beauty retailers also play a pivotal role in promoting sustainability, but many vary when it comes to setting standards for the brands they sell. While some companies have launched initiatives like Sephora's "Clean + Planet Positive" program or Target's "Target Zero" icon, others lack transparency and accountability.
The missing piece of the puzzle is regulation and standardization. Certifications like B Corp are beneficial, but their voluntary nature limits their impact. Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for sustainability claims would help drive meaningful change in the industry. Industry leaders emphasize that market leadership is key to driving climate-conscious change.
In the absence of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices, this "leadership" - undertaken by brands and customers alike in the beauty marketplace - will likely be the most impactful vector for addressing the industry's climate shortcomings. It will take continued collective advocacy and initiative to drive meaningful climate-conscious change in the $500 billion global beauty industry.
. Like, some companies are totally on top of their game with refillable packaging and sourcing ingredients from sustainable suppliers, but then you've got others just slapping "clean" on a product and calling it a day 
. It's like they're just trying to sell more stuff rather than actually making changes that benefit the planet.
. The fact that some companies are doing great but many others are not holding them up is a huge problem. And what's with the lack of standardization? It's like they're all just winging it 
. We need governments and multinationals to step in and set some baseline standards for sustainability claims, or else we'll never really see meaningful change happen.
. Sephora's program is a great example of what can be achieved when companies prioritize sustainability. And customers are also making their voices heard, which is awesome 
. It just goes to show that even in the beauty industry, we can make a difference if we work together and demand better from our brands 
so i think its crazy how much pressure consumers are putting on big beauty brands to go sustainable... 60% of people care about it that's like a huge chunk of the market 
but meanwhile, greenwashing is still super common... its like companies just slap these eco-friendly labels on their products and call it a day... i mean we need real transparency and certification standards here 
its crazy how much plastic the industry uses and then they expect us to recycle it all... but recycling rates are so low 
and supply chain limitations make it hard to get PCR plastic on a large scale... i wish there was more regulation and standardization in place 
but we need more of them to follow suit 
and governments need to step up their game too 
Is it really just about reducing our carbon footprint or is there something deeper at play? 
I think we're trying to compensate for the emptiness within ourselves by making external choices that make us feel more connected to the world around us. 
The fact that consumers are willing to pay more for eco-friendly products suggests that we're desperate for a sense of meaning and purpose in our purchasing decisions. 
It's like, we want to believe that our beauty habits can somehow create a better world, but is that just a way to distract ourselves from our own existential crises? 
The industry's reliance on marketing terms like "clean beauty" is also revealing – it's like they're trying to sell us a sense of self-worth rather than actually changing their practices. 
Can we really trust the language and claims made by brands, or are we just being sold a bill of goods? 
It's clear that regulation and standardization are needed to drive meaningful change, but I'm not convinced it's just about policy changes – there needs to be a fundamental shift in how we think about consumption and sustainability. 
how can we expect sustainability when we r still usin so much single-use plastics? industry leaders need 2 take bold action & not just say they care about sustainability 
maybe w/ enough pressure & advocacy, we can drive meaningful change in the beauty industry
, people are finally waking up to the importance of sustainability. those 35% willing to pay more for eco-friendly products is a big step forward 
. maybe we can't get governments to act fast enough, but its great that industry leaders are taking initiative and pushing for change 
. I mean, 60% of consumers are like "sustainability is a must" but it's not translating into real change. The whole industry is just patching things up with some eco-friendly packaging and calling it a day 
. I mean, 67% of the industry's packaging volume is just plastic... it's crazy! 
... I mean, they're trying their best, but it's like, how many times can you say "clean" before it just becomes a buzzword? 
. They're still using massive amounts of plastic packaging and claiming they're being sustainable? 
.
. It's like they're using buzzwords to sell more stuff 
. Market leadership is key to driving climate-conscious change, so let's hope these companies can do better 
!
I mean, if only 50% of the major brands can agree on some standards for eco-friendliness then what's the point? 
. They're talking the talk, but not always walking the walk 
. We need stricter regulations and standardized certifications to ensure sustainability claims are legit 
. It's frustrating when we can't trust what we see on packaging or ads 
. Let's be real, some brands just want to sell more products 
.
.
. I ended up driving through this tiny town that had the most adorable thrift store. I spent like 20 minutes browsing through old clothes and found these super comfy vintage denim shorts 
. The best part? They were literally one dollar! 
.
. We need to hold these companies accountable for their sustainability claims and make sure they're being transparent 
.
. and not just voluntary certifications that don't count for much 
. and yeah, it's true that we need more transparency and better labeling 
. Consumers are getting more eco-aware and want to know what's in their products, but brands are still being kinda shady 
. It's like, "Oh, we're clean beauty now" 
️. Like, come on governments and big brands, let's step up our game 
.
.
the beauty industry is all about appearances right now. They're talkin' about bein' sustainable and eco-friendly, but when you scratch beneath the surface, it's like, "where's the proof?" 
Come on, industry leaders, step up your game! We need regulation and standardization, not just a bunch of feel-good initiatives.