Waterstones boss defends government's business rates shake-up

Waterstones boss defends government's business rates shake-up as "sensible" despite criticism from bookshops' trade body.

James Daunt, the chief executive of Waterstones, has come out to defend the UK government's recent change to business rates, which have been met with skepticism by many retailers, particularly those in the high street. Daunt says that while some large and successful sites like its flagship on London's Piccadilly will be hit hard by the increases, others in struggling areas will benefit from lower rates.

Daunt believes that this policy shift will encourage neighboring businesses to reopen, citing examples of shops in Newport in Wales, Grimsby in Lincolnshire, and Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria. He argues that Waterstones' advantages include being able to attract neighbors back into the area, making it a more attractive option for retailers.

However, this argument is not shared by the Booksellers Association, which has expressed deep concern over the government's business rates reforms. The association's managing director, Meryl Halls, says that 85% of its members are now less likely to invest in stock, staffing, events, or their premises due to the changes.

Daunt also remains calm about other recent tax changes, including a higher minimum wage and increased employers' national insurance contributions. He argues that these changes will not be a major burden for Waterstones, which does not typically employ people on short-hour contracts.

Despite this confidence, Daunt acknowledges that some costs may arise from the new tax measures, but he believes they are manageable and reasonable. The company's sales have shown resilience, with a 7% increase to Β£565.6m in its UK trading arm for the year ending May 3, 2025, although pre-tax profits fell by about Β£3m.

Daunt also shows no concern about Waterstones' potential initial public offering (IPO), as he believes that its private equity owner, Elliott Investment Management, will sell the business at some point.
 
πŸ“šπŸ’° The UK government's business rates shake-up is all about survival of the fittest, and I think it's interesting to see how big players like Waterstones are handling it πŸ€”. Daunt's got a point that smaller towns might benefit from lower rates, but what about the high street's overall health? It's not just about individual shops reopening, but also the bigger picture of foot traffic and consumer behavior πŸšΆβ€β™€οΈ.

On a related note, I'm loving how Waterstones is bucking the trend with its UK trading arm sales being up 7% despite pre-tax profits falling πŸ’Έ. That's some impressive resilience! As for the IPO rumblings, let's see what happens next πŸ€‘. One thing's for sure – it'll be interesting to watch how this all plays out in the retail world πŸ‘€.
 
come on daunt thinks a 7% sales increase is a silver bullet? πŸ€‘ waterstones is still struggling to compete with online book sellers and it's just a matter of time before they get squeezed out by amazon or another big player. i mean, Β£3m less pre-tax profits isn't exactly a cause for celebration either... 85% of booksellers are saying no thanks to the new business rates, and you're just gonna tell us it's all good? πŸ€”
 
You know, I've been around for a while and seen my fair share of changes in the high street. This business rates shake-up is one of those things that'll either make or break small bookshops like Waterstones' neighbors. Daunt's optimistic about it being "sensible" but let me tell you, I've got friends who own independent bookstores and they're worried sick πŸ€”. They might not be big enough to take advantage of the lower rates in struggling areas, so I'm not sure how that'll play out for them. It's all about perspective, I guess. But what I do think is interesting is how this policy change could affect the overall vibe of high streets across the UK πŸ“šπŸ’Ό
 
omg u wont believe wat daunt said lol 85% of bookshops r less likely to invest in anything now 🀯 thats a big chunk. i feel like hes tryna spin this into somethin positive but its hard not 2 see it from the booksellers assoc side. i mean wat about all the small indie shops that cant compete w/ da rates? theyre already strugglin and now its gonna get harder for dem to stay afloat πŸ€•
 
im think watstone's boss is a bit too optimistic lol πŸ€”

their argument that it'll be good for struggling towns is interesting, but i dont see how 1 big bookshop like watstones making all those other shops in nearby towns suddenly want to reopen πŸ’Έ

the booksellers association seems pretty worried, and im not sure why we're just gonna assume they're wrong πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

anyway, watstones' sales are still pretty decent, so maybe daunt knows something i dont πŸ€‘
 
πŸ€” The government's latest move on business rates has got me thinking... I mean, it's all about finding a balance between supporting struggling high streets and encouraging growth in other areas, right? πŸ“ˆ But, I gotta say, it feels like they're just pitting one area against the other. It's like, what if those small towns and villages that are getting more favorable rates end up losing even more shops and businesses over time? πŸ€• The Booksellers Association is right to be worried, you know? They're already struggling as it is. And I'm not convinced that Waterstones' plan to bring in neighboring businesses will really make a difference... πŸ“Š
 
I don't get why Daunt's being so chill about this business rates shake-up πŸ€”. I mean, it's not like the gov's just going to magically make all those high street bookshops thrive again πŸ’Έ. And what about the ones that are already struggling? It feels like they're getting hit with even more debt πŸ”₯. Daunt's trying to spin this as some kinda savior for struggling areas, but I'm not buying it πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. The booksellers association is seeing real impact from these changes, and it's hard to blame them πŸ˜”.
 
idk why they gotta make it so hard for small bookshops πŸ€”. Daunt's trying to spin this like it's a good thing for struggling areas, but honestly, it just sounds like more pressure on tiny shops that can barely keep their heads above water. I mean, 85% of the booksellers association members aren't investing in their businesses? That's terrifying for the industry as a whole. And now Waterstones is gonna be able to attract neighboring shops back in because they're willing to take a hit on their rates? it just feels like a recipe for disaster πŸ“šπŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” I'm still trying to get my head around these changes to business rates. I mean, I've been in my online community for ages, and we're always talking about how important it is for small businesses to have a solid financial footing. And now, the government's just gone and changed things up again. It's like they think big retailers like Waterstones can just absorb all the hits.

I'm not sure I buy James Daunt's argument that this will encourage other shops to reopen. I've seen so many high street stores shut down in recent years, and it doesn't seem like a new shop would magically pop up next door because of a lower rate. Plus, what about all the smaller bookshops that can't compete with Waterstones' massive resources?

And don't even get me started on the Booksellers Association's concerns. 85% of their members are less likely to invest in their businesses? That's a big number, if you ask me. It just goes to show how uncertain this policy shift is going to be for many retailers.

I guess only time will tell if Daunt's right or not, but I'm still keeping an eye on things from my online perch πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” I think this is a great example of how businesses need to adapt to changing times. Daunt's idea that smaller shops in struggling areas might benefit from lower rates is a clever way to boost local economies. But let's not forget that these changes can be tough for many retailers, especially the high-street ones.

It makes me think about the importance of being flexible and resilient in business. Just like how Waterstones has shown its sales resilience despite some costs arising from new tax measures, we can learn from that. We should also consider the impact on smaller businesses and support them if we can.

I'm not sure if I fully agree with Daunt's optimism about the IPO, but it shows that even in uncertain times, companies need to have a long-term plan. Maybe we can all take a cue from Waterstones' approach and be more proactive in our own lives? πŸ’‘ After all, change is inevitable, so let's make sure we're ready for whatever comes next! πŸš€
 
πŸ€” the gov's trying to boost high street revival, but the rates shake-up is gonna hurt smaller bookshops big time... i get that larger stores like Waterstones can absorb the hit, but what about independent shops in struggling areas? they'll just close up shop and leave empty spaces behind πŸ“šπŸ’Έ daunt's argument about attracting neighbors back into the area might work for some, but it's not a silver bullet πŸ’”
 
😊 I think Daunt's trying to spin this in a way that might make sense for his company, but the reality is that small bookshops are getting hit hard. πŸ€” Have you been to any of those struggling towns? It's like they're being squeezed out by bigger chains like Waterstones. The Booksellers Association has a point - 85% not investing in their businesses is huge. That's going to impact the high street even more. Maybe Daunt just hasn't looked at the bigger picture, huh? πŸ“šπŸ’Έ
 
idk man... i mean, im not saying daunt is wrong or anything but come on 85% of bookshops are freaking out cuz of these changes? thats a pretty big chunk! its like theyre gonna just magically start selling more books and stuff without worrying about the costs πŸ€‘πŸ“š. what if new shops dont wanna set up in those towns because they cant afford it? isnt that gonna hurt the community more in the long run? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€”πŸ’‘ So like, I think Daunt's got a valid point about how this new rates thingy can be a double-edged sword πŸ—‘οΈ. On one hand, it might help bring in those neighboring shops and make our high streets more interesting again 😊. But on the other hand, 85% of bookshops being less likely to invest? That's just not good for the industry πŸ“šπŸ˜¬.

And can we talk about how Waterstones is doing so well despite all this? Like, a 7% increase in sales and still pre-tax profits aren't as rosy πŸ€‘. It just goes to show that some businesses are more adaptable than others πŸ”„.

Personally, I'd be happy if Waterstones went public πŸ“ˆ. Imagine the competition it would bring in! πŸ’ͺ
 
I mean, it's nice to see the gov't is looking out for small businesses and all that πŸ™„... I'm sure it has nothing to do with them wanting to make sure those cute little bookshops on high street don't get too comfortable πŸ˜’. James Daunt thinks he's a genius for pointing out that smaller towns might benefit from lower rates, but I bet he hasn't actually been to those places in years πŸš—... Meanwhile, the Booksellers Association is like "yeah no thanks" and Daunt just rolls his eyes and expects everyone else to be okay with it πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. And good luck with that IPO, Waterstones... when you inevitably get sold out for pennies πŸ˜‚
 
πŸ€” i dunno if james daunt's argument is really convincing... like, 85% of bookshops are already hesitant to invest due to the new rates? πŸ“šπŸ˜¬ and what about those struggling areas he mentioned in wales and lincolnshire? are they just gonna magically turn around because waterstones moves in? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ anyway, daunt's got a point that having waterstones nearby might attract other businesses... but is it really worth losing some of its own profits? πŸ’Έ
 
"It's better to be in a corner than on top" πŸ€”πŸ“šπŸ’Έ - Albert Camus

I think it's crazy how Waterstones is defending these crazy tax changes and still thinking they're a good idea. The Booksellers Association has a lot of valid concerns, but Daunt just ignores them and keeps talking about how it'll be fine... meanwhile, the actual bookshops are suffering πŸ“–πŸ˜©
 
Ugh, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this business rates shake-up πŸ€―πŸ“Š. As a book lover and someone who's super into layout (I mean, have you seen the way they design their stores? 😍), it's really frustrating to see Waterstones' CEO James Daunt defending these changes like they're a good thing πŸ’Έ.

The fact that he thinks this will encourage neighboring businesses to reopen just doesn't add up for me πŸ€”. I've been to those struggling towns you mentioned (Newport, Grimsby, Barrow-in-Furness) and trust me, it's not that simple πŸ—ΊοΈ. The Booksellers Association is right to be worried about the impact on their members.

And what really gets my goat is Daunt's attitude towards other tax changes πŸ€‘. Like, if he thinks these new rates won't affect Waterstones significantly, then why should we trust him? πŸ˜’ It just feels like they're playing a game of "let's see how much we can squeeze out of our customers" πŸ’Έ.

I don't know about you guys, but I'm definitely keeping an eye on this one πŸ‘€. Will Waterstones' IPO even happen if their private equity owner is planning to sell? πŸ€” Only time will tell...
 
😊 I think Daunt's optimism is really cool! The idea that smaller bookshops in struggling areas might benefit from lower rates is a great point. It's not just about the big guys like Waterstones making it out okay 🀩. Some of those little shops might actually thrive in this new environment πŸ’‘. Of course, the Booksellers Association has valid concerns too, but Daunt makes some good points about Waterstones' position and how they can attract other businesses back to the area πŸ‘.
 
Back
Top