With Hochul endorsement, did Mamdani lose tax-the-rich leverage?

Mayor Zohran Mamdani's surprise endorsement of Governor Kathy Hochul has sparked questions about whether he lost leverage in his push for taxing the rich. The move comes as progressives are growing increasingly frustrated with Hochul's resistance to raising taxes on affluent New Yorkers.

Mamdani's statement, published in The Nation, acknowledges that he and Hochul "do not agree on everything," particularly when it comes to taxation of the wealthy. However, he claims to believe that the wealthiest individuals can afford to pay more, a position at odds with Hochul's centrist views.

Despite this, Mamdani praises Hochul's agreement to support child care as a significant victory for their shared goals. The governor has pledged to fund two years of a pilot program, but the long-term funding plan remains uncertain.

Mamdani's endorsement is seen as a strategic move by some observers, who point out that he may be trading short-term gains on his tax proposal for longer-term benefits in Albany. Basil Smikle, a former Democratic strategist, notes that Mamdani likely secured additional concessions from Hochul in exchange for her support.

The impact of this endorsement on the debate over taxing the rich remains to be seen. India Walton, a rival candidate challenging Hochul's re-election bid, views the move as a calculated gamble by Mamdani.

As the two candidates continue to vie for support, one thing is clear: the future of taxation in New York City hangs in the balance. Will Mamdani's endorsement prove to be a turning point in the debate, or will Hochul remain steadfast on her centrist views? Only time will tell.
 
I'm kinda worried about this whole tax thing... like I know I was all for taxing the rich back in the day (throwback 2010s, anyone?) but now that I think about it, it's kinda complicated. I mean, what if Mamdani is trying to get something from Hochul in return? Like, a sweet deal on some major policy change or something. It's all about strategy and politics, you know?

And can we talk about the timing of this endorsement? Is this just a calculated move by Mamdani to sway public opinion or what? I'm not saying it's all bad, but I do hope they don't forget where they're coming from. We need leaders who are gonna fight for what's right, you feel?

It's also got me thinking about the future of New York City... will we ever see real change on taxation and inequality? The debate rages on, and it's anyone's game right now ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ’ธ
 
I'm so stoked about this development! ๐Ÿคฉ Mayor Zohran Mamdani is totally showing his support for Governor Kathy Hochul and I am LOVING it!!! ๐Ÿ˜ It's awesome that he's standing by their shared goals, especially the child care initiative - it's a huge win for families in NYC! ๐Ÿ’– The fact that Mamdani is trying to trade short-term gains for longer-term benefits is total genius, if you ask me... ๐Ÿค“ Let's see how this all plays out and hope that Hochul's centrist views bring some much-needed compromise to the table! ๐Ÿค Fingers crossed for a better future for NYC families! ๐Ÿ’•
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised by Mayor Zohran Mamdani's sudden change of heart ๐Ÿค”. He was all about taxing the rich, but now he's backing off and saying the wealthiest individuals can afford to pay more ๐Ÿ’ธ. That's not exactly what his supporters were expecting.

I think this endorsement is a bit of a strategic move on his part, trying to get ahead in Albany ๐Ÿ“ˆ. But at the same time, it's still unclear whether it'll actually make a difference in the tax debate ๐Ÿ”ฎ. I mean, Hochul's been pretty clear about her centrist views, and if Mamdani can't sway her on this issue, what else is he gonna get? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

It's also worth noting that Mamdani's statement kind of glosses over their differences on taxation ๐Ÿ”. It's like, yeah, we don't always agree, but let's focus on the big picture ๐ŸŒŽ. Not exactly what his critics are looking for in terms of transparency ๐Ÿค.

Anyway, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out in the long run โฐ. Will Mamdani's endorsement turn the tide on taxation, or will Hochul stay the course? Only time will tell โณ๏ธ.
 
I'm thinking that maybe this move by Mayor Zohran is like, you know when you're trying to manifest a specific outcome but life keeps throwing curveballs ๐Ÿคฏ. Mamdani's gotta weigh the pros and cons of trading his tax proposal for Hochul's support - is it really worth it? I mean, we all want those child care benefits to happen, but at what cost? ๐Ÿ’ธ It's like trying to balance your self-care routine with work commitments... sometimes you gotta make tough choices ๐Ÿคฏ. Can't wait to see how this plays out in the coming weeks! ๐Ÿ“Š
 
I'm totally worried about this tax thing ๐Ÿค”... my kid is still young but I've been thinking about how we're going to afford their education and healthcare when they grow up ๐Ÿ’ธ. The idea that some rich people might have to pay more seems fair, but at the same time, you gotta wonder if it's just a drop in the bucket for them ๐ŸŒŠ. It feels like politicians are always making promises they can't keep, which is frustrating as a parent trying to plan for my kid's future ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. Can we trust that Hochul will actually follow through on her plans? I'm keeping an eye on this one, that's for sure ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
I feel like this whole thing reminds me of 2010 when President Obama and the Democrats tried to pass that tax increase bill... I don't know if Mamdani really thought it through ๐Ÿค”. If he's trading off his short-term gains for longer-term benefits, then what's the point? And India Walton is right on target - this is just a calculated gamble by Mamdani. It'll be interesting to see how Hochul responds when she gets back to Albany ๐Ÿ“Š
 
I'm still thinking about the good old days when we had politicians who actually listened to their constituents... like 20 years ago ๐Ÿ˜”. I mean, what's with all these deals and trade-offs? Can't we just get some real change for once? Mamdani's endorsement of Hochul is just a shame - it feels like he's selling out on his own values ๐Ÿค•. And now we're stuck waiting to see if this whole thing will even make a difference... meanwhile, the rich guys are getting richer ๐Ÿ’ธ. I swear, the more things change, the more they stay the same ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
I'm so sick of this forum's moderation policies ๐Ÿ™„. It's like they're more concerned with policing our opinions than actually facilitating discussion. I post my thoughts on this story about Mayor Zohran Mamdani endorsing Governor Kathy Hochul, and suddenly it's off-topic? Come on guys! Can't we just have a respectful debate without being shut down?

And don't even get me started on the lack of nuance in these discussions ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. People are piling on like a mob, with no one willing to take the high road or consider alternative perspectives. I'm all for holding politicians accountable, but let's not forget that there are real people behind these policies ๐Ÿ’ธ.

Mamdani's endorsement is interesting, though - it says a lot about his willingness to compromise and work across party lines ๐Ÿค. And hey, if Hochul's support on child care is the takeaway from this, then I'm here for it ๐Ÿ‘ถ. But can we please, for once, have a thoughtful discussion without being shouted down?
 
I'm not buying it ๐Ÿค”... This whole thing smells like politics as usual. I need some hard evidence that Mamdani really believes in taxing the rich and isn't just playing both sides to get what he wants. A little transparency from him would be nice, you know? And what's with Hochul's sudden willingness to budge on taxation? Was this a strategic move by Mamdani all along or did she genuinely change her stance? Sources are essential here... ๐Ÿ“ฐ
 
I wonder if Kathy Hochul is gonna change her mind about taxing the rich ๐Ÿค”, now that Zohran Mamdani has given his support ๐Ÿ’ฌ. I mean, he's saying that the wealthy can afford to pay more, but we all know how politics works - it's all about who's got the leverage ๐Ÿ’ธ. Maybe Mamdani is trying to get something in return for his endorsement, like Basil Smikle said ๐Ÿค. Either way, this is definitely gonna make things interesting in Albany ๐Ÿ”ฅ. India Walton thinks he's making a calculated move, but we'll just have to wait and see what happens next โฐ.
 
I gotta say, I'm a bit underwhelmed by Mayor Mamdani's surprise move ๐Ÿค”. I mean, he's basically giving up on his tax proposal and trading it in for some concessions from Hochul ๐Ÿ˜’. If he really wants to push for taxing the rich, why not just go all in and risk it? Instead, he's playing it safe and hoping that Hochul will magically change her mind ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

And let's be real, this endorsement is probably more about Mamdani trying to stay relevant in Albany ๐Ÿ‘€. He needs a win to keep his seat, and if backing Hochul gives him that, then so be it ๐Ÿ’ธ. But I'm still not convinced that this will actually help the cause of taxing the rich or even improve childcare funding ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. We'll just have to wait and see how it all plays out in the end ๐ŸŽฒ
 
You know how sometimes you really want something but then you have to make some sacrifices for what's best in the long run? ๐Ÿค” Like, maybe you're all about getting that dream car now, but it might cost you some cash upfront or delay your goals. Same thing with Mamdani here... he wants his tax proposal done and dusted, but by endorsing Hochul, he's kinda gotta put those plans on the backburner for now. It's a tough call, but sometimes we gotta prioritize what's truly important in the bigger picture ๐ŸŒŠ
 
idk why he would do this ๐Ÿค”... I mean, mamdani was making waves with his tax plan and now it's all just being watered down. i thought we were gonna have some real change for once but now it seems like Hochul is just buying her way into office ๐Ÿค‘. Mamdani's endorsement feels like a sellout to me... he must be in it for something other than the greater good ๐Ÿ’ธ. what's going on here? why won't they just stick to their guns? ๐Ÿ˜’
 
I feel like this whole situation reminds me of when my school is trying to decide whether we should have a student council fundraiser that targets the more affluent students... it's always hard to find a balance between making sure everyone pays their fair share and not alienating those who are already struggling. I think Mamdani's endorsement is kinda like, he's taking a calculated risk by supporting Hochul's views on child care funding - it might seem like a small win now, but what about when the bigger picture comes into play? It's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out ๐Ÿค”
 
I think this whole thing is super tricky for Mamdani and his tax plan. I mean, endorsing Hochul might give him some points with her supporters, but it also means he's kind of tied to her stance on the issue. What if she changes her mind or can't deliver on her promises? That would be a major bummer for his campaign. On the other hand, if he sticks by his guns and pushes for the tax raise anyway, it could backfire and make him look like the one who's being stubborn. ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm not buying it... ๐Ÿค” Mamdani thinks he can just flip-flop on his tax plan and get away with it? Please. This endorsement is all about gaining power, nothing more. I mean, who doesn't love a good trade-off for some sweet Albany favors? ๐Ÿค‘ Hochul's trying to hold the line on taxes, but she's got Mamdani's vote to play with... that's gotta count for something, right? ๐Ÿ˜’ Meanwhile, Indy Walton is just waiting in the wings, ready to pounce on any mistake Hochul makes. Mark my words, this endorsement will be a wild card in the game of NYC politics... and I'm not convinced it'll work out in Mamdani's favor ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
I'm kinda wondering what's going through Zohran Mamdani's mind right now ๐Ÿค”... one sec I thought he was gonna run against Kathy Hochul 'cause they had differences on taxing the rich, but now it looks like he's trading that for a bigger pie in Albany ๐Ÿฐ. Basil Smikle makes a point that Mamdani probably got some extra goodies from her in return, but I dunno if that's enough to save him from getting roasted by India Walton ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ... will Mamdani's endorsement change the game or was it just a PR stunt? The rich guys are still gonna get richer no matter what ๐Ÿ’ธ, and we're all stuck dealing with the fallout ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
I gotta say, this whole situation is a total wild card ๐Ÿƒ. One minute you've got Mayor Zohran Mamdani endorsing Governor Kathy Hochul's re-election campaign, and the next thing you know, people are wondering if he lost all his momentum on taxing the rich ๐Ÿ’ธ. It just doesn't add up, you know?

On one hand, I can see why Mamdani would want to support Hochul - she's agreed to back child care funding, which is a big deal for many families ๐Ÿค. But at the same time, it feels like he might've given up some leverage by endorsing her in the first place ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I'm not sure what's going on with Hochul and the other candidates, but it's clear that this endorsement has shaken things up โšก๏ธ. Will Mamdani's support help turn the tide for his tax proposal, or will Hochul stick to her guns? I guess we'll just have to wait and see ๐Ÿ”ฎ...
 
I'm soooo disappointed in Zohran right now ๐Ÿ˜” He's literally throwing away his chance to push for progressive change by backing down on taxing the rich ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘Ž Mamdani's endorsement is more about playing politics than actually fighting for what's right ๐Ÿค Hochul's gonna use him and throw him under the bus when she needs him most ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ I'm not buying it ๐Ÿ‘€ Can't trust her word either, always saying one thing but doing another ๐Ÿ™„
 
Back
Top